A Brief Note from the Author Before Getting into “YAY! Fun Talking Points for the Holidays!”:
Major political and social changes most often occur during a national crisis. In such unpredictable times, people are vulnerable, and the nature of politics is to take advantage of that vulnerability.
Obviously, you the reader, know that we’re in a crisis. A crisis so shrouded in mystery that even questioning its validity is immediately censored. In fact, for the past 3 months, almost all of my blog posts were “rejected” , despite following ALL guidelines by these self-proclaimed “neutral” platforms.
Apologies for the covertness, but now, through lopsided censorship, I’m forced to come up with a sarcastic tagline like: “Yay! Fun Talking Points for the Holidays!”, (instead of what I really want to say) in hopes that the social media “long-arms” won’t immediately shut down an important message for us all:
“Do not just immediately accept all information provided to you as fact. Knowledge is power, and education is the key to unlocking it. Look things up. Do some research outside of your “feeds”. You’ll see that a LOT of things simply don’t add up with this “crisis”.”Dr. Sal Martingano
So now… Here I am. A Doctor. A Speaker. An Author. A retired Educator and proud Italian from Bensonhurst, (Brooklyn) New York- just trying to share thoroughly-researched information that could help us all through these troubling times. This is my effort to see if I can skate by the social media police and get my message across. Let’s see what happens…
False Reports: What is Considered a COVID-19 Death?
Never before have death certificates been intentionally falsified to meet an agenda!
The CDC is counting any death, no matter what the primary cause is, to reflect a COVID-19 death- if that death involves any secondary possibility of COVID symptoms.
For example, in this video, Dr. Ngozi Ezike of the Illinois Department of Public Health attempts to justify these false reports with the following statement:
“Even if you died of a clear alternate cause, but you had COVID at the time, it’s still listed as a COVID death. So, everyone who’s listed as a COVID death doesn’t mean that was the cause of the death, but they had COVID at the time of death.”Dr. Ngozi Ezike
Illinois Department of Public Health
So why are we taking any of these “reports” seriously? Public Health officials literally admitted that the numbers are false- right to our collective faces. Also… how come the CDC doesn’t show “recovered” cases on their website? Once diagnosed, are you just permanently COVID positive for the rest of your life? How are these fake numbers ever supposed to go down? It seems like the only answer is clear-cut, non-COVID deaths- because anything else could potentially add to these intentionally-misleading “numbers”.
Real COVID Numbers vs. Seasonal Flu
Our entire presidential election cycle was altered to accommodate the COVID pandemic. Even the the CDC quietly admitted the following:
“Only 6% of all reported COVID-19 deaths were solely the result of the COVID-19 virus.”Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
COVID Deaths are not Actually at Pandemic Levels
As of 11/19/2020 total COVID deaths in the U.S. is: 256,609. If only 6% represent true COVID-19 deaths, then the actual number is: 15,360… far below pandemic levels.
Arbitrary “Positive” Cases
COVID-19 is the perfect cover for intimidation and fear based on arbitrary positive cases. Schools in NYC, for example, shut down because of a 3% reported positive “test rate”, not mentioning whether actual cases exist.
Speaking of False Positives… Let’s Talk “PCR Tests”
The Reason Why PCR Testing Yields False Positives
On July 20, 2020, in the podcast “This Week in Virology”, Dr. Fauci stated the following:
“The PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run at 35 cycles or higher. At that rate, a positive result, indicating infection cannot be accepted or believed.”Dr. Anthony Fauci
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
07/20/20 Podcast: “This Week in Virology”.
NOTE: A testing cycle represents the number of “attempts” to locate a virus. The COVID-19 virus requires no more than 35 attempts to isolate the virus. Too many attempts uncover irrelevant viral fragments- thus rendering false positives.
“Cycles” and False Reporting from Hospitals and Private Labs
Remember when Dr. Fauci said that PCR tests above 35 cycles could “not be accepted or believed”? Well, hospitals and private labs currently perform testing at 38 to 40 cycles- thus the accuracy is minuscule- providing more false positives.
The New York Times reported the following:
“The number of cycles needed to find the virus is never included in the results sent to doctors or the coronavirus patients.”New York Times
PCR Testing, The Political Agenda, and the World Stage
There appears to be a political agenda in play that must be recognized and stopped.
Politicians all over the US are using FDA-approved, rising positive PCR tests to drive people back into lockdowns- altering the very fabric of world economic stability.
This should be noted as FDA malpractice, since it is the FDA that authorizes PCR testing for public use.
In fact, the World reaction to rising COVID-19 cases has led Belgium Health Experts to demand an Investigation of the World Health Organization for faking the Coronavirus Pandemic.
Q: Why are there Deliberate False Positives in PCR Testing? A: Incentives.
There are incentives for hospitals/labs reporting positive COVID-19 cases.
A patient, upon entering a hospital (for any reason) is asked if they have any symptoms like a cough, runny nose or sore throat- and if the patient has come in contact with anyone who tested positive for Covid? If the answer is yes to either, then the patient’s initial diagnosis is COVID-19.
The problem with hospitals is that the protocol for coding COVID deaths is that they don’t even need to be accurate. Deaths can just be assumed as COVID- without verification or any actual testing. The American Academy of Pediatrics states the following (when assigning diagnosis codes for COVID-19):
“Assign code U07.1, COVID-19, for a confirmed diagnosis of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) as documented by the provider, a positive COVID-19 test result or a presumptive positive COVID-19 test result. Confirmation does not require documentation of the type of test performed; the provider’s documentation that the individual has COVID-19 is sufficient.”American Academy of Pediatrics
May 07, 2020
If Medicare patients enter the hospital for any reason and are presumed to have been in contact with COVID-19, hospitals across the United States are paid 20% additional funding due to the higher cost for their care.
Have Protective Measures Against COVID-19 Worked?
Social Distancing? No.
Social distancing has been exploited as a method to reduce COVID-19 spread, yet since COVID-19 is an “aerosol” virus, it is unaffected by social distancing.
Face Masks? Nope.
Face masks are designed to trap “droplets”, from sneezing and coughing. Other than the N-95 mask, paper and cloth masks allow droplets to escape in all directions, (including back into the wearer’s eyes) rendering those masks useless.
In fact, in September, 2020, the CDC released a report revealing the following:
“Despite over 70 percent of the case-patient participants’ efforts to follow CDC recommendations by committing to always wearing face coverings at “gatherings with ≤10 or >10 persons in a home; shopping; dining at a restaurant; going to an office setting, salon, gym, bar/coffee shop, or church/religious gathering; or using public transportation,” they still contracted the virus.”Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
The report concluded face masks were not effective in preventing the spread of COVID-19.
Constant Hand Sanitization? No.
Although washing hands regularly makes for good general hygiene, using hand sanitizers continuously also destroys the body’s natural germ fighting moisture barrier.
Lockdowns? Nope. Example 1:
In 2006, four infectious disease specialists stated that there was no scientific evidence to support that a national quarantine would halt the spread of infection:
“Experience has shown that communities faced with epidemics or other adverse events respond best and with the least anxiety when the normal social functioning of the community is least disrupted.”Report: “Disease Mitigation Measures in the Control of Pandemics”
Lockdowns? Nope. Example 2:
In the May 5, 2020 Edition of The Lancet Medical Journal, Swedish infectious disease clinician Johan Giesecke, (a World Health Organization (WHO) advisor) concluded the following:
“It has become clear that a hard lockdown does not protect old and frail people living in nursing homes- the population the lockdown was designed to protect. Neither does it decrease mortality from COVID-19, which is evident when comparing the UK’s experience with that of other European countries.”Johan Giesecke
Advisor – World Health Organization
Lockdowns? Nope. Example 3:
Statistician William M. Briggs compared countries that locked down with countries that didn’t, and concluded the following:
“In every case, countries with no lockdowns demonstrated a fraction of deaths per million than countries with lockdowns.”William M Briggs
Professor – Cornell Medical School
U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin stated:
“There is a risk of permanent damage to the economy if the country remains locked down much longer.”Steven Mnuchin
U.S. Secretary of the Treasury